Difference between Theft and Robbery
Dr. Tanmoy Mukherji
Advocate
Difference between Theft and Robbery -
Tanmoy Mukherji
Advocate

|
Subject |
Theft
|
Robbery |
|
Relevant Sections
|
Sec. 303, BNS
|
Sec. 309, BNS
|
|
Ingredients
|
→ Dishonest intention →Moveable property →Without Consent →No force or fear
|
→Theft or Extortion →Use of force or fear →Immediate harm or threat →Presence of Victim
|
|
Nature
|
Simple offence
|
Aggravated offence
|
|
Violence
|
No Violence
|
Violence Involved
|
|
Fear
|
No Fear
|
Fear of instant harm
|
|
Consent
|
Without Consent
|
Consent by fear
|
|
Presence of Victim
|
Not Necessary
|
Necessary
|
|
Use of Weapon
|
Not required
|
often used
|
|
Injury
|
No Injury
|
Injury may occur
|
|
Severity
|
Less Serious
|
More Serious
|
|
Punishment
|
Lesser Punishment
|
Higher Punishment
|
|
Mode
|
Secret Taking
|
Open + forceful
|
|
Intention
|
Dishonest Only
|
Dishonest + Coercive
|
|
Time Element
|
Anytime
|
Immediate Threat
|
|
Conversion
|
Theft remains theft
|
Theft becomes Robbery when force used.
|
|
Extortion Link
|
NO
|
YES (Robbery may include Extortion)
|
|
Fear Type
|
Absent
|
Instant Fear (Death/Hurt)
|
|
Resistance
|
No Resistance
|
Victim Resistance overcome |
|
Example
|
Pickpocket
|
Snatching with knife
|
|
Legal Gravity
|
Lower
|
Higher
|
|
Public Safety
|
Less Impact
|
High Public Danger
|
|
Mens Rea
|
Dishonesty
|
Dishonesty + Violence Intent
|
|
Reference Case
|
Pyare Lal Bhargava v. State of Rajasthan → Temporary removal of property with dishonest intention = theft. → Even if property is returned later, offence is complete. K.N. Mehta v. State of Rajasthan → Dishonest intention is essential element for theft.
|
Shiv Kumar v. State → Use of threat or force converts theft to robbery. State of Maharashtra v. Joseph Mingel Koli →Robbery involving violence is treated very seriously, especially when life is endangered.
|
Step 1→ Property taken dishonesty = Theft
Step 2→ Is "Force Used"?
Yes = Robbery
No = Theft
Theft + Violence/Fear of instant injury = Robbery.