Difference between Theft and Extortion
Dr. Tanmoy Mukherji
Advocate
Difference between Theft and Extortion-
Tanmoy Mukherji
Advocate

|
Basis
|
Theft
|
Extortion
|
|
Definition
|
Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of the possession of any person without that person's consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to 'commit theft'.
|
Whoever, intentionally puts any person in fear of any injury to that person or to any other person, and thereby dishonestly induces the person so put in fear to deliver to any person any property or valuable security, or anything signed which may be converted into a valuable security, commits extortion.
|
|
Relevant Section
|
303, BNS
|
308, BNS
|
|
Nature of Consent
|
No consent at all.
|
Consent, obtained, but by coercion or by fear.
|
|
Use of Force
|
No force or fear required.
|
Fear or threat is essential.
|
|
Possession
|
Property taken without owner's knowledge.
|
Property, delivered by victim due to fear.
|
|
Mode of taking
|
Direct physical taking
|
Indirect - Victim gives property.
|
|
Victim's Role
|
Passive (Not aware or not consenting)
|
Active (Gives property due to fear)
|
|
Type of Property
|
Only Moveable property
|
Moveable or valuable security.
|
|
Presence of victim
|
Not Necessary
|
Usually, victim is present
|
|
Mental element
|
Dishonest intention to take
|
Intention + Fear + inducement
|
|
Example
|
Stealing a phone from bag
|
Threatening someone to transfer money
|
|
Punishment
|
Imprisonment or fine or both
|
Generally, more severe if threat is serious
|
|
Delivery of Property
|
Without victim's involvement
|
With victim's involvement
|
|
Threat element
|
Not required
|
Essential Element
|
|
Location of Property
|
must be moveable & taken
|
Can be any deliverable property
|
|
key ingredient
|
Taking
|
Inducing Delivery
|
|
Act Completion
|
When property is moved
|
When property is delivered
|
|
Possession Change
|
Without consent
|
With coerced consent
|
|
Reference Case
|
Pyarelal Bhargava v. State of Rajasthan
|
R.S. Nayak v. A.R. Antulay.
|