Difference between Robbery and Extortion
Dr. Tanmoy Mukherji
Advocate
Difference between Robbery and Extortion-
Tanmoy Mukherji
Advocate

|
Subject
|
Extortion
|
Robbery
|
|
Relevant Section
|
Sec. 308, BNS
|
Sec. 309, BNS
|
|
Ingredient
|
→ Intentionally putting a person in fear of Injury. →The fear may be of future harm. →Dishonest Intention. →Inducing the person to deliver property. →Delivery is made by the victim.
|
→There must be theft or extortion. →Use of force, violence or fear. →Fear must be immediate. →Victim must be present. →Property is taken instantly. →Dishonest Intention.
|
|
Nature
|
Simple offence
|
Aggravated offence
|
|
Fear
|
Fear of Injury
|
Immediate fear of Violence
|
|
Consent
|
Consent obtained by fear
|
No real Consent
|
|
Timing of Fear
|
May be future
|
Must be immediate
|
|
Presence
|
Not Necessary
|
Victim must be Present
|
|
Force
|
Not Necessary
|
Force or threat essential
|
|
Delivery
|
Victim Delivers property
|
Property taken forcibly
|
|
Mode
|
Indirect
|
Direct & Violent
|
|
Threat Type
|
Can be future harm
|
Instant harm
|
|
Gravity
|
Less Serious
|
More Serious
|
|
Example
|
"Pay otherwise I'll harm you later".
|
"Give money now otherwise I am killing you"
|
|
Weapon
|
Not required
|
Often used
|
|
Injury
|
No Injury needed
|
Injury Possible
|
|
Legal form |
Independent offence |
Aggravated form |
|
Conversion |
May become robbery |
Already aggravated |
|
Reference Case |
R. V. Hickman → Fear can be of future Injury in Extortion
|
Shiv Kumar v. State → Immediate threat + Presence = Robbery. State of Maharashtra v. Joseph Mingel Koli → Robbery involving Violence treated more serious. |
