Difference between Reference and Review
Dr. Tanmoy Mukherji
Advocate
Difference between Reference and Review-
Tanmoy Mukherji
Advocate

|
Basis |
Reference |
Review |

|
Meaning |
A Reference is made by a subordinate court to a High Court when it has doubt regarding- → Validity of laws, or →Interpretation of Law.
|
A Review is when the same Court re-examines its own judgement due to- → Error apparent on face of record. → Discovery of new evidence → Other sufficient reason
|
|
Provision |
Section 113, Order 46. |
Section 114, Order 47 |
|
Initiation |
By court, Suo-Motu |
By Aggrieved party |
|
Court |
High Court decides |
Same Court decides |
|
Nature |
Advisory Jurisdiction. |
Corrective Jurisdiction. |
|
Stage |
Before final Judgement. |
After decree/Order. |
|
Purpose |
Resolve legal doubt |
Correct error |
|
Scope |
Limited to legal questions |
Limited but wider than reference |
|
Grounds |
Validity of law or interpretation of law |
→Error apparent →New evidence. |
|
Right of party |
No direct right |
Statutory right. |
|
Discretion |
Court's discretion |
No discretion |
|
Effect |
Binding opinion of High Court |
May alter Judgement |
|
Appeal |
Not appealable directly |
Order in review may be available |
|
Time limit
|
No specific rigid limit.
|
Must be within limitation.
|
|
Evidence
|
No fresh evidence.
|
New evidence allowed (strict conditions).
|
|
Constitutional link
|
Often involves constitutional validity
|
No constitutional question necessary.
|
|
Frequency
|
Rare.
|
Relatingly more common.
|
|
Mechanism
|
Consultation mechanism.
|
Reconsideration mechanism.
|